cabecera

 
ICREPQ |   AEDIE |   Sponsors |   Links | RE&PQJ-main |  RE&PQJ-papers home
 

Risk mitigation of performance ratio guarantees in commercial photovoltaic systems

H.A. Basson, J.C. Pretorius

2016/5/20

Abstract

This study demonstrates the importance of managing the risk of performance ratio guarantees, which typically are applicable to most commercial PV projects. A qualitative assessment of the performance metrics has shown multiple performance parameters, which could influence the Performance Ratio. Alternative performance metrics, including the Temperature Corrected Performance Ratio and the Weather Corrected Performance Ratio were evaluated by means of a quantitative analysis. The Temperature– and Weather Corrected Performance Ratios have both demonstrated the capability of reducing the inter-annual and seasonal variance experienced with the conventional Performance Ratio. The respective performance metrics were further calculated from multiple years of meteorological data in order to construct a statistical distribution for each performance metric. The resulting probability distribution function was then used to determine the probable risk percentiles for each of the respective performance metrics and compared with the separately calculated performance metrics referring to a long-term mean data set. It was demonstrated that the long-term mean derived performance parameters did present a risk for overstating the facilities’ performance. The risk was mitigated by referring to the multi-year’s P90 percentile instead.

Published in: Renewable Energy & Power Quality Journal (RE&PQJ, Nº. 14)
Pages: 120-125 Date of Publication: 2016/5/20
ISSN: 2172-038X Date of Current Version:2016/05/04
REF: 244-16 Issue Date: May 2016
DOI: 10.24084/repqj14.244 Publisher: EA4EPQ

Authors and affiliations

H.A. Basson, J.H.C. Pretorius
Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment.. University of Johannesburg , Auckland Park. South Africa

Key words

PR Probability, Performance Ratio, Temperature Corrected Performance Ratio, Weather Corrected Performance Ratio.

References

[1] D. Schroeder and E. Cullen, “Risk Protection For Midsize Solar Installations,” Solar Industry, vol. 6, no. 1, February 2013.
[2] J. Meydbray, R. O'Connell and A. T. Braff, “Hot Issues in PV Performance and Solar Project Finance,” October 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.wsgr.com/publications/PDFSearch/braff-103112.pdf. [Accessed 10 January 2015].
[3] K. Whyte and D. McNair, “EPC Contracts in the Renewable Energy Sector - South African RE IPP Programme - Lessons Learned from Phases 1 and 2,” October 2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.dlapiper.com/files/Publication/958e6736-27df-42ae-9f5f-a0cffe7e5fcd/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/0d63553d-dbfe-49e7-8f18-c01e6bcac7e0/epc-contracts-renewable-energy-south-africa-2.pdf. [Accessed 10 March 2014].
[4] T. Dierauf, A. Growitz, S. Kurtz, J. L. B. Cruz, E. Riley and C. Hansen, “Weather-Corrected Performance Ratio,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, 2013.
[5] S. Ransome, “Modelling inaccuracies of PV energy yield simulations,” IEEE, New York, 2008.
[6] B. Marion, J. Adelstein, K. Boyle, H. Hayden, B. Hammond, T. Fletcher, B. Canada, D. Narang, D. Shugar, H. Wenger, A. Kimber, L. Mitchell, G. Rich and T. Townsend, “Performance Parameters for Grid-Connected PV Systems,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, 2005.
[7] International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 61724 Photovoltaic system performance monitoring – Guidelines for measurement, data exchange and analysis, 1st ed., Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 1998.
[8] D. Jordan, “Methods for Analysis of Outdoor Performance Data,” in 2011 Photovoltaic Module Reliability Workshop, Golden Colorado, 2011.
[9] A. Cronin, “University of Arizona Photovoltaics Download Historical UAPV Datasets,” 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.uapv.physics.arizona.edu/dlpvdata.php. [Accessed February 2015].
[10] Institute of the Sciences of the Environment, University of Geneva, “PVsyst V6.35,” PVsyst SA, Geneva, 2015.
[11] S. Mau and U. Jahn, “Performance analysis of grid-connected PV systems,” International Energy Agency, Köln, 2006.
[12] A. Mermoud, “Modeling Systems Losses in PVsyst,” in 2013 Sandia PV Performance Modeling Workshop, Santa Clara, CA, 2013.
[13] T. Stoffel, A Review of Measured/Modeled Solar Resource Uncertainty, Santa Clara, CA: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2013.
[14] T. Stoffel, D. Renné, D. Myers, S. Wilcox, M. Sengupta, R. George and C. Turchi, “Concentrating Solar Power: Best Practices Handbook for the Collection and Use of Solar Resource Data,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, 2010.
[15] J. S. Stein, C. P. Cameron, B. Bourne, A. Kimber, J. Posbic and T. Jester, “A Standardized Approach to PV System Performance Model Validation,” in PV Specialists Conference, 2010 35th IEEE, Honolulu, 2010.
[16] R. Pitz-Paal, N. Geuder, C. Hoyer-Klick and C. Schillings, “How to get bankable meteo data? DLR solar resource assessment,” Deutsches Zentrum fur Luft- und Raumfahrt, Cologne, 2007.
[17] D. Thevenard and S. Pelland, “Estimating the uncertainty in long-term photovoltaic yield predictions,” Solar Energy, no. 91, pp. 432-445, 2011.
[18] M. Schnitzer, Reducing Uncertainty in Solar Energy Estimates A Case Study, Santa Clara, CA: Sandia National Laboratories, 2013.
[19] F. He, Z. Zhao and L. Yuan, “Impact of inverter configuration on energy cost of grid-connected photovoltaic systems,” Renewable Energy, vol. 41, pp. 328-335, 2012.
[20] A. Dobos, P. Gilman and M. Kasberg, “P50/P90 Analysis for Solar Energy Systems Using the System Advisor Model,” in 2012 World Renewable Energy Forum, Denver, Colorado, 2012.
[21] National Renewable Energy Laboratory, “National Solar Radiation Data Base 1961 - 1990: Typical Meteorological Year 2,” [Online]. Available: http://www.rredc.nrel.gov/solar/old_data/nsrdb/. [Accessed March 2015].

 
pie